Mirror Finish Polishing ~ 1-816-529-6089 ~ sales@mirrorfinishpolishing.com ~ mirrorfinishpolishing.com For the best rate on home, auto, life or business/commercial insurance call me at 888-959-0955, cell 636-734-1310 or bricehazelwood@weiss-ins.com. Never Done Garage - donewhenimdead.com Peerless Automotive Reconditioning - 1155 W. Dennis Ave, Olathe Ks, 66061 - 913-893-1201 Mark H. Epstein ~ The Epstein Law Firm, LLC ~ 913-396-5123 Wilkes Automotive ~ wilkesautomotive.com ~ 246 Marion St, Olathe, KS 66061 ~ 913-254-7171 Skandalous Inc ~ www.skandalousinc.com DIY Auto Repair Inc ~ www.diyautorepairkc.com ~ 11509 Strangline Rd, Olathe KS 66062 ~ 913-226-3806 Your advertisement here! The Law Offices of Jeremiah Johnson, LLC ~ 104 E. Poplar, Olathe, KS 66061 ~ (913)764-5010 ~ www.kcatty.com - www.johnsoncountydui.com ~ jeremiah@kcatty.com Santa Fe Body, Inc ~ 8717 Lenexa Drive, Overland Park, KS 66214 ~ (913) 894-6090 House of Boost LLC Nude? HouseofHID.com - The #1 source for HID The Print Shop KC 816.200.6694 or Ryan@RMD-Photography.com the art of tyleR ~ http://tyleR.bigcartel.com ~ TYLERcoey.com ~ MUTTtoy.com ~ MUTTtoy@gmail.com W-K Chevrolet Buick Pontiac Cadillac GMC ~ 3310 W. Broadway, Sedalia, MO 65301 ~ 800-382-5088 ~ Cell 660-553-8928 ~ dustin@wkchevy.com ~ www.wkchevy.com

Go Back   KCSR - THE Kansas City Forum > Automotive Forums > Video & Photography

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 2017-09-13, 01:22 PM   #101
CBass
 
CBass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 52
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 1
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 9
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0
Default

I still to this day do not understand why BMW made a M235i & then turned around & released the M2.
CBass is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-13, 01:40 PM   #102
jwdb1fish
 
jwdb1fish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sharpening my harpoon.
Posts: 11,991
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 32
Thanks (Received): 453
Likes (Given): 44
Likes (Received): 3864
Dislikes (Given): 7
Dislikes (Received): 123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBass View Post
I still to this day do not understand why BMW made a M235i & then turned around & released the M2.


It's for those that want to keep up with their JoCo buddies but can't quite afford a real M version.
__________________
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Likes Billy Mild, Squeaky192, mild83 liked this post
jwdb1fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-13, 02:18 PM   #103
mild83
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: cabrini green
Posts: 14,246
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 925
Thanks (Received): 335
Likes (Given): 6331
Likes (Received): 2725
Dislikes (Given): 128
Dislikes (Received): 131
Default

DaveB did you get a dynometer reading on this bad boy?
mild83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-13, 05:22 PM   #104
Wallace
 
Wallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: OP
Posts: 7,467
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 26
Thanks (Received): 113
Likes (Given): 252
Likes (Received): 895
Dislikes (Given): 9
Dislikes (Received): 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mild83 View Post
DaveB did you get a dynometer reading on this bad boy?
For a stock car?
Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-13, 10:00 PM   #105
mild83
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: cabrini green
Posts: 14,246
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 925
Thanks (Received): 335
Likes (Given): 6331
Likes (Received): 2725
Dislikes (Given): 128
Dislikes (Received): 131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallace View Post
For a stock car?
I ask bc he keeps mentioning rwhp
mild83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-14, 01:19 PM   #106
Dave B
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Creating DaveBisms
Posts: 11,926
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 15
Thanks (Received): 133
Likes (Given): 24
Likes (Received): 998
Dislikes (Given): 4
Dislikes (Received): 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBass View Post
I still to this day do not understand why BMW made a M235i & then turned around & released the M2.
That would be like saying why do they make a 335/435/340/440 when you could have an M3/M4. The M235/250 is just the turbo I6 variant of the 2 series. BMW choose to make it a bit special by giving it all the M Sport parts including an adaptive suspension, steering wheel, factory tune (increases HP/TQ by about 20hp/30tq over the standard I6 turbos), M Sport brakes, and some other sporting features hence the "M" in it's name. The M235 came out in model year 2014. The M2 for 2017.

The M2 is damn nice and I'm jealous of it's body work. If I were to total my M235, it would be hard not to get that. The biggest issue I have with the M2 is dealer mark up. It's nearly impossible to find a new M2, especially a 6MT, for less than $60K and many are listed for $70K. I paid $46K for my M235 and could add a $300 tune to make it as quick as a stock M2. Add sticky tires and a $2,000 mechanical LSD and it's going to perform as good as the M2. Will never look as good though, but I'm not sure I can justify the extra $14K to get the fenders and wheels. I know the M2 is a better performing and feeling car though. I don't need to be reminded of that
__________________
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Likes 4drTurbo liked this post
Dave B is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-14, 01:25 PM   #107
Dave B
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Creating DaveBisms
Posts: 11,926
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 15
Thanks (Received): 133
Likes (Given): 24
Likes (Received): 998
Dislikes (Given): 4
Dislikes (Received): 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mild83 View Post
DaveB did you get a dynometer reading on this bad boy?
Why waste the time and money? These cars in stock 6MT form consistently put down ~310whp/330wtq on the Dynojet. The automatics, fractionally less. Add a catted downpipe and gain another 15whp/25wtq (no tune needed). Add a simple piggyback tune and you're at ~350whp/370wtq. That's plenty for me.
Dave B is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-14, 08:04 PM   #108
CBass
 
CBass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 52
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 1
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 9
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave B View Post
That would be like saying why do they make a 335/435/340/440 when you could have an M3/M4. The M235/250 is just the turbo I6 variant of the 2 series. BMW choose to make it a bit special by giving it all the M Sport parts including an adaptive suspension, steering wheel, factory tune (increases HP/TQ by about 20hp/30tq over the standard I6 turbos), M Sport brakes, and some other sporting features hence the "M" in it's name. The M235 came out in model year 2014. The M2 for 2017.

The M2 is damn nice and I'm jealous of it's body work. If I were to total my M235, it would be hard not to get that. The biggest issue I have with the M2 is dealer mark up. It's nearly impossible to find a new M2, especially a 6MT, for less than $60K and many are listed for $70K. I paid $46K for my M235 and could add a $300 tune to make it as quick as a stock M2. Add sticky tires and a $2,000 mechanical LSD and it's going to perform as good as the M2. Will never look as good though, but I'm not sure I can justify the extra $14K to get the fenders and wheels. I know the M2 is a better performing and feeling car though. I don't need to be reminded of that
I've driven both & have two M3's. BMW became sellouts with marketing. They rebadged a 235i just like they did with the X5 & called it an "MSport". If they built a M335i I would be saying the same thing.
CBass is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-14, 08:36 PM   #109
Wallace
 
Wallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: OP
Posts: 7,467
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 26
Thanks (Received): 113
Likes (Given): 252
Likes (Received): 895
Dislikes (Given): 9
Dislikes (Received): 21
Default

I just wish there was more of a drastic difference between the M235i and the M2. Especially with the new B58s in the M240i. The M car just doesn't feel like an M car should.
Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-15, 09:58 AM   #110
Dave B
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Creating DaveBisms
Posts: 11,926
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 15
Thanks (Received): 133
Likes (Given): 24
Likes (Received): 998
Dislikes (Given): 4
Dislikes (Received): 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBass View Post
I've driven both & have two M3's. BMW became sellouts with marketing. They rebadged a 235i just like they did with the X5 & called it an "MSport". If they built a M335i I would be saying the same thing.
I think that's spot on. Now Audi and Benz are making S and AMG enhanced standard models because BMW has made so much money on their M Sport line. BMW has done a really good job at blurring the "M" badge and purpose.

Last edited by Dave B; 2017-09-15 at 10:01 AM..
Dave B is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-15, 10:02 AM   #111
JDLM
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lenexa
Posts: 158,351
Post Thanks / Like
Default

Think that is why Albert Biermann bounced
__________________

AW|E90|ZSP|ZPP|2XA|NAV|HID| ///M | BMS |JB4 | VRSF



JDLM is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-16, 03:15 PM   #112
bimmertech
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,143
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 26
Thanks (Received): 42
Likes (Given): 71
Likes (Received): 208
Dislikes (Given): 2
Dislikes (Received): 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallace View Post
I just wish there was more of a drastic difference between the M235i and the M2. Especially with the new B58s in the M240i. The M car just doesn't feel like an M car should.
i feel the exact opposite. the F10/F82/F87 are all so much different than the base models that i felt like bmw was finally trying to build a great car rather than bolting on some parts and hoping the badge works. these are the first M cars that truly feel unhinged.
bimmertech is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-17, 09:53 AM   #113
mild83
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: cabrini green
Posts: 14,246
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 925
Thanks (Received): 335
Likes (Given): 6331
Likes (Received): 2725
Dislikes (Given): 128
Dislikes (Received): 131
Default

What did you pay for it DaveB?
mild83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-17, 10:32 AM   #114
jwdb1fish
 
jwdb1fish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sharpening my harpoon.
Posts: 11,991
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 32
Thanks (Received): 453
Likes (Given): 44
Likes (Received): 3864
Dislikes (Given): 7
Dislikes (Received): 123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mild83 View Post
What did you pay for it DaveB?

More than you can afford, pal.
__________________
jwdb1fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-17, 11:36 AM   #115
Dave B
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Creating DaveBisms
Posts: 11,926
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 15
Thanks (Received): 133
Likes (Given): 24
Likes (Received): 998
Dislikes (Given): 4
Dislikes (Received): 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bimmertech View Post
i feel the exact opposite. the F10/F82/F87 are all so much different than the base models that i felt like bmw was finally trying to build a great car rather than bolting on some parts and hoping the badge works. these are the first M cars that truly feel unhinged.
"Unhinged"? Like in a good way?


After 20 months of ownership, my biggest compliant with the M235/240 is the "adaptive" suspension and the reduced grip in the front because the 225/40R18 tires. With my new wheels, I'll be able to run 245s in the front which should help. The adaptive shocks though never feel like they can achieve the right damping. It can sometimes feel like a mismatched aftermarket spring and shock combo on certain surfaces. It's not terrible, but I think I was expecting more from BMW. The M2 doesn't have adaptive shocks, it's just a typical passive system. The M3/M4 can be ordered with a cheaper passive suspension as well. IMO, that's the way to go.

Last edited by Dave B; 2017-09-17 at 11:57 AM..
Dave B is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-17, 11:49 AM   #116
Dave B
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Creating DaveBisms
Posts: 11,926
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 15
Thanks (Received): 133
Likes (Given): 24
Likes (Received): 998
Dislikes (Given): 4
Dislikes (Received): 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mild83 View Post
What did you pay for it DaveB?
A bit over 46K. Could have bought one of seven loaded M235xi's Baron had on their lot at the time at a heavily discounted price of $44K-46K (about $5K-7K off). However I wanted a 6MT, no nav, and no moonroof. I had to basically pay more for less to order exactly what I wanted. I'm completely fine with that. It's a combo hardly anyone would want, especially the lack of nav. I just run Google Maps or Waze and broadcast it via BT. I do voice commands to the nav/phone via my steering controls as well.

I have to say the M235xi I drove was impressively quick. That automatic is spot on with hard, fast, instant up and downshifts with no boost loss of shifts. From a stop, AWD and the ability to brake boost is where it's at if drag racing is your thing. The new M240xi is bonkers with the 1/4 mile times it's throwing down in stock form. How about 12.4@109-110mph BONESTOCK? It's a solid .3 second and 2-3mph faster than the M235 variants. Add a tune and downpipe for $2,000 and you're deep into the 11s for a car that cost under $50K (loaded and with mods), can carry 4 people, and can be driven in all conditions.
__________________
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Thanks mild83 thanked for this post

Last edited by Dave B; 2017-09-17 at 12:15 PM..
Dave B is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-18, 07:56 AM   #117
ReidStylez
Yahh Trick Yahh!
 
ReidStylez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 27,167
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 9
Thanks (Received): 98
Likes (Given): 41
Likes (Received): 929
Dislikes (Given): 11
Dislikes (Received): 25
Default

Buys a BMW, can't afford to upgrade photobucket account to share pictures of his BMW.
__________________
2011 Toyota Tacoma DCLB SR5
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Likes Keboh liked this post
ReidStylez is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-18, 08:23 AM   #118
Wallace
 
Wallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: OP
Posts: 7,467
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 26
Thanks (Received): 113
Likes (Given): 252
Likes (Received): 895
Dislikes (Given): 9
Dislikes (Received): 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReidStylez View Post
Buys a BMW, can't afford to upgrade photobucket account to share pictures of his BMW.
To be fair, no one should be paying that. Photobucket is trying to pull a fast one on all of their users.
Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 2017-09-18, 12:43 PM   #119
Dave B
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Creating DaveBisms
Posts: 11,926
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 15
Thanks (Received): 133
Likes (Given): 24
Likes (Received): 998
Dislikes (Given): 4
Dislikes (Received): 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReidStylez View Post
Buys a BMW, can't afford to upgrade photobucket account to share pictures of his BMW.
Only a sucker would pay for photo hosting for general use, regardless of their financial status. I'm using Tinypic now.
Dave B is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.13.37
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright (c) 1993-2012, KCSR.org